Author:
Teasdale J. D.,Walsh P. A.,Lancashire M.,Mathews A. M.
Abstract
SummaryA replication study was conducted of the treatment of agoraphobics by exposure in cohesive groups, as described by Hand, Lamontagne and Marks (1974). The continuing improvement during follow-up, with consequent large overall improvement, reported in the original study was not replicated. However, the present study confirmed the usefulness of this procedure as a highly cost-efficient treatment.The assumed equivalence of the Gelder and Marks (1966) phobic rating scale and its modification by Watson and Marks (1971) was examined. Large discrepancies between the scales were obtained for initial assessments and change scores. It is suggested that there is a need for workers in this field to agree on methods of measurement.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Cited by
46 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Agoraphobia;The Wiley Handbook of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy;2013-10-10
2. Gruppenpsychotherapie der Panikstörung;Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik;2009-09-01
3. Group Processes and Outcomes in Group Psychotherapy: Is It Time to Let Go of “Cohesiveness”?;International Journal of Group Psychotherapy;2009-04
4. Beyond Cohesiveness;Small Group Research;2007-10
5. Group cohesion in cognitive-behavioral group therapy for social phobia;Behaviour Research and Therapy;2007-04