Author:
Löwe Bernd,Blankenberg Stefan,Wegscheider Karl,König Hans-Helmut,Walter Dirk,Murray Alexandra M.,Gierk Benjamin,Kohlmann Sebastian
Abstract
BackgroundInternational guidelines advocate depression screening in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and other chronic illnesses, but evidence is lacking.AimsTo test the differential efficacy of written patient-targeted feedback v. no written patient feedback after depression screening.MethodPatients with CHD or hypertension from three cardiology settings were randomised and screened for depression (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01879111). Compared with the control group, where only cardiologists received written feedback, in the intervention group both cardiologists and patients received written feedback regarding depression status. Depression severity was measured 1 month (primary outcome) and 6 months after screening.ResultsThe control group (n = 220) and the patient-feedback group (n = 155) did not differ in depression severity 1 month after screening. Six months after screening, the patient-feedback group showed significantly greater improvements in depression severity and was twice as likely to seek information about depression compared with the control group.ConclusionsPatient-targeted feedback in addition to screening has a significant but small effect on depression severity after 6 months and may encourage patients to take an active role in the self-management of depression.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献