Author:
Coid Jeremy W.,Ullrich Simone,Kallis Constantinos
Abstract
SummaryStructured risk assessment aims to help clinicians classify offenders according to likelihood of future violent and criminal behaviour. We investigated how confident clinicians can be using three commonly used instruments (HCR-20, VRAG, OGRS-II) in individuals with different diagnoses. Moderate to good predictive accuracy for future violence was achieved for released prisoners with no mental disorder, low to moderate for clinical syndromes and personality disorder, but accuracy was no better than chance for individuals with psychopathy. Comprehensive diagnostic assessment should precede an assessment of risk. Risk assessment instruments cannot be relied upon when managing public risk from individuals with psychopathy.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference10 articles.
1. A Comparison of Predictors of General and Violent Recidivism Among High-Risk Federal Offenders
2. Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk.
3. Gender differences in structured risk assessment: comparing the accuracy of five instruments;Coid;J Consult Clin Psychol,2009
4. Predicting violence using structured professional judgment in patients with different mental and behavioral disorders
5. The impact of psychopathy on violence among the household population of Great Britain;Coid;Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol,2010
Cited by
69 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献