Author:
Barth Michael,Kriston Levente,Klostermann Swaantje,Barbui Corrado,Cipriani Andrea,Linde Klaus
Abstract
BackgroundIt has been suggested that the efficacy of antidepressants has been
overestimated in clinical trials owing to unblinding of drug treatments
by adverse events.AimsTo investigate the association between adverse events and the efficacy of
selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).MethodThe literature was searched to identify randomised, double-blind,
placebo-controlled trials of SSRIs in the treatment of major depression.
Efficacy outcomes were response to treatment and change in depressive
symptoms. Reporting of adverse events was used as an indicator of
tolerability. Random effects meta-analyses were used to calculate pooled
estimates. Meta-regression analyses were performed to investigate the
association between adverse events and efficacy. Potential mediation was
investigated with the Baron & Kenny approach.ResultsA total of 68 trials (n = 17 646) were included in the
analyses. In meta-analysis SSRIs were superior to placebo in terms of
efficacy (odds ratio, OR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.51–1.72). More patients
allocated to SSRIs reported adverse events than did patients receiving
placebo (OR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.58–1.89). Meta-regression analyses did not
find an association between adverse events and efficacy
(P = 0.439). There was no indication of adverse
events mediating the effect of SSRI treatment.ConclusionsOur results do not support, but also do not unequivocally disprove, the
hypothesis that adverse events lead to an overestimation of the effect of
SSRIs over placebo.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献