Author:
Bisson Jonathan I.,Tavakoly Behrooz,Witteveen Anke B.,Ajdukovic Dean,Jehel Louis,Johansen Venke J.,Nordanger Dag,Garcia Francisco Orengo,Punamaki Raija-Leena,Schnyder Ulrich,Sezgin A. Ufuk,Wittmann Lutz,Olff Miranda
Abstract
BackgroundHow best to plan and provide psychosocial care following disasters remains keenly debated.AimsTo develop evidence-informed post-disaster psychosocial management guidelines.MethodA three-round web-based Delphi process was conducted. One hundred and six experts rated the importance of statements generated from existing evidence using a one to nine scale. Participants reassessed their original scores in the light of others' responses in the subsequent rounds.ResultsA total of 80 (72%) of 111 statements achieved consensus for inclusion. The statement ‘all responses should provide access to pharmacological assessment and management’ did not achieve consensus. The final guidelines recommend that every area has a multi-agency psychosocial care planning group, that responses provide general support, access to social, physical and psychological support and that specific mental health interventions are only provided if indicated by a comprehensive assessment. Trauma-focused cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) is recommended for acute stress disorder or acute post-traumatic stress disorder, with other treatments with an evidence base for chronic post-traumatic stress disorder being made available if trauma-focused CBT is not tolerated.ConclusionsThe Delphi process allowed a consensus to be achieved in an area where there are limitations to the current evidence.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Cited by
169 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献