Author:
Lasalvia Antonio,Bonetto Chiara,Lenzi Jacopo,Rucci Paola,Iozzino Laura,Cellini Massimo,Comacchio Carla,Cristofalo Doriana,D'Agostino Armando,de Girolamo Giovanni,De Santi Katia,Ghigi Daniela,Leuci Emanuela,Miceli Maurizio,Meneghelli Anna,Pileggi Francesca,Scarone Silvio,Santonastaso Paolo,Torresani Stefano,Tosato Sarah,Veronese Angela,Fioritti Angelo,Ruggeri Mirella,
Abstract
BackgroundThe GET UP multi-element psychosocial intervention proved to be superior to treatment as usual in improving outcomes in patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP). However, to guide treatment decisions, information on which patients may benefit more from the intervention is warranted.AimsTo identify patients' characteristics associated with (a) a better treatment response regardless of treatment type (non-specific predictors), and (b) a better response to the specific treatment provided (moderators).MethodSome demographic and clinical variables were selecteda priorias potential predictors/moderators of outcomes at 9 months. Outcomes were analysed in mixed-effects random regression models. (Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01436331.)ResultsAnalyses were performed on 444 patients. Education, duration of untreated psychosis, premorbid adjustment and insight predicted outcomes regardless of treatment. Only age at first contact with the services proved to be a moderator of treatment outcome (patients aged ≥35 years had greater improvement in psychopathology), thus suggesting that the intervention is beneficial to a broad array of patients with FEP.ConclusionsExcept for patients aged over 35 years, no specific subgroups benefit more from the multi-element psychosocial intervention, suggesting that this intervention should be recommended to all those with FEP seeking treatment in mental health services.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献