Author:
Barbic Skye P.,Cano Stefan J.
Abstract
SummaryThis commentary argues the importance of robust, meaningful assessment of clinical and functional outcomes in psychiatry. Outcome assessments should be fit for the purpose of measuring relevant concepts of interest in specific clinical settings. As well, the measurement model selected to develop and test assessments can be critical for guiding care. Three types of measurement models are presented: classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory. To optimise current diagnostic and treatment practices in psychiatry, careful consideration of these models is warranted.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference12 articles.
1. Validation of the brief version of the Recovery Self-Assessment (RSA-B) using Rasch measurement theory.
2. The problem with health measurement;Cano;Patient Pref Adher,2011
3. Translating Clinical Science Into Effective Therapies
4. Improving the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in MS: the role of new psychometric methods;Hobart;UK Health Techn Assess Prog (Monograph),2009
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献