‘Rabone’ and four unresolved problems in mental health law

Author:

Szmukler George,Richardson Genevra,Owen Gareth

Abstract

SummaryIn a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of the UK ruled that the state has a special operational duty to protect the right to life in informal psychiatric in-patients (‘Rabone case'), in sharp distinction to general medical or surgical patients. We will argue that the significance of this case is general, not just local, and that it exposes four important unresolved problems in mental health law: the place of decision-making capacity; the meaning of ‘informal’ admission; parity between mental and physical health; and the accuracy of risk assessment.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference16 articles.

1. Inner London collaborative audit of admission in two health districts. III: Reasons for acute admission to psychiatric wards;Flannigan;Br J Psychiatry,1994

2. Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: cross-sectional study

3. Rabone and another v Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust [2012] UKSC 2.

4. Edwards v United Kingdom (2002) 36 EHRR 487.

5. Rabone and Pennine Care NHS Trust [2009] EWHC 1827 (QB).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3