Montgomery and shared decision-making: implications for good psychiatric practice

Author:

Adshead Gwen,Crepaz-Keay David,Deshpande Mayura,Fulford K.W.M (Bill),Richards Veryan

Abstract

SummaryThe 2015 Supreme Court judgment in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 established that consent to medical treatment requires shared decision-making based on dialogue between the clinician and patient. In this editorial, we examine what Montgomery means for standards of good psychiatric practice, and argue that it represents an opportunity for delivering best practice in psychiatric care.Declaration of interestNone.

Publisher

Royal College of Psychiatrists

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference13 articles.

1. Coercion and Treatment Satisfaction Among Involuntary Patients

2. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582, 587.

3. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Introduction;Seminars in General Adult Psychiatry;2024-03-31

2. Consent during labour and birth as observed by midwifery students: A mixed methods study;Women and Birth;2023-11

3. Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;2022-11-11

4. Montgomery's legal and practical impact: A systematic review at 6 years;Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice;2021-10-08

5. Shared decision-making and the implementation of treatment recommendations for depression;Patient Education and Counseling;2021-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3