Author:
Ofori-Atta A.,Attafuah J.,Jack H.,Baning F.,Rosenheck R.,
Abstract
BackgroundCare of people with serious mental illness in prayer camps in low-income countries generates human rights concerns and ethical challenges for outcome researchers.AimsTo ethically evaluate joining traditional faith healing with psychiatric care including medications (Clinical trials.gov identifier NCT02593734).MethodResidents of a Ghana prayer camp were randomly assigned to receive either indicated medication for schizophrenia or mood disorders along with usual prayer camp activities (prayers, chain restraints and fasting) (n= 71); or the prayer camp activities alone (n= 68). Masked psychologists assessed Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) outcomes at 2, 4 and 6 weeks. Researchers discouraged use of chaining, but chaining decisions remained under the control of prayer camp staff.ResultsTotal BPRS symptoms were significantly lower in the experimental group (P= 0.003, effect size –0.48). There was no significant difference in days in chains.ConclusionsJoining psychiatric and prayer camp care brought symptom benefits but, in the short-run, did not significantly reduce days spent in chains.Declaration of interestNone.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference28 articles.
1. Prayer Camps and Biomedical Care in Ghana: Is Collaboration in Mental Health Care Possible?
2. The role of global traditional and complementary systems of medicine in the treatment of mental health disorders
3. Efficacy of Pharmacotherapy and Psychotherapy for Adult Psychiatric Disorders
4. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd edn). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
5. Patient-rated versus clinician-rated side effects of drug treatment in schizophrenia. Clinical validation of a self-rating version of the UKU Side Effect Rating Scale (UKU-SERS-Pat);Lindstrom;Nord J Psychiatry,2001
Cited by
94 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献