Author:
Everitt B. S.,Gourlay A. J.,Kendell R. E.
Abstract
During the last twenty years countless attempts have been made to refine, replace or validate our intuitive clinical classifications of mental illness by the statistical analysis of symptom ratings. By and large these attempts have been unsuccessful. In spite of all the elegant and complex manipulations to which innumerable sets of data have been subjected, the classifications used by psychiatrists remain much as they were before the computer was invented. The reasons for this failure—for as such it must be seen at least by clinicians—are complex, but we would attribute it mainly to two factors: a failure to appreciate how unreliable and open to bias are the clinical ratings on which most analyses have been based, and too exclusive a reliance on factor analysis at the expense of other forms of multivariate analysis.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference23 articles.
1. Torgerson W. S. (1968). ‘Multidimensional representation of similarity structures.’ In Classification in Psychiatry and Psychopathology (ed. Katz , Cole and Barton ). Washington D.C.
2. Classification of Depressed Patients: A Cluster Analysis Derived Grouping
Cited by
121 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献