Author:
Becker Thomas,Holloway Frank,McCrone Paul,Thornicroft Graham
Abstract
BackgroundService evaluation requires a detailed understanding of the services studied.MethodCommunity mental health services evaluated in the PRiSM Psychosis Study in south London are described. The intensive sector and standard sector services are contrasted.ResultsThe intensive sector had two teams with extended opening hours: a psychiatric acute care and emergency (PACE) team, and a psychiatric assertive continuing care (PACT) team focusing on care for people with chronic illness. In the standard sector there was a generic community team providing office-hour assessments, case management of the severely mentally ill and close liaison with in-patient services. The team made use of the local psychiatric emergency clinic and of other local resources. The intensive sector was characterised by: more admissions to fewer beds, more non-hospital residential places, extended hours, on-call rota, wider range of interventions, more medical and nursing staff, a lower nursing grade mix and higher staff turnover. The standard sector had a less highly resourced generic community psychiatric service.ConclusionsChange in services has been more marked in the intensive sector.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference11 articles.
1. Strathdee G. (1992) The interface between psychiatry and primary care in the management of schizophrenic patients in the community. In The Prevention of Depression and Anxiety (eds Jenkins R. , Newton J. & Young R. ), pp. 59–68.
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献