The new Foundation Programme Mental Health Curriculum: foundation doctors’ perceptions of its importance and their competency: pre–post psychiatric placement evaluation study

Author:

Varvari IoanaORCID,Dewhurst Thomas,Jones Corinne,Haslam Richard

Abstract

Aims and method The new 2021 UK Foundation Programme Curriculum mandates foundation doctors to acquire mental health competencies. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of psychiatry placements in facilitating competency attainment, foundation doctors’ perceived importance of acquiring these and their preferred teaching methods. Utilising Kirkpatrick's evaluation framework, the study employed a pre–post intervention design assessing the impact of psychiatry placements on 135 foundation doctors across three cohorts from August 2021 to March 2022. Results Initially, foundation doctors assigned high importance to mental health competencies. Post-placements, this perceived importance improved slightly, whereas that of clinical skills scenarios slightly decreased. Significant confidence increases were observed in recognising and assessing specific psychiatric disorders. Foundation doctors favoured small seminar groups and on-the-job ad hoc teaching. Qualitative insights underscored the need for context-specific teaching. Clinical implications Psychiatry placements enhance foundation doctors’ confidence and perceived importance of mental health competencies as specified by the curriculum. Addressing clinical scenario gaps through context-specific teaching and transferable skills development is essential. Customised teaching approaches, especially small seminars and ad hoc teaching, hold promise for effective mental health training.

Publisher

Royal College of Psychiatrists

Reference21 articles.

1. How to improve mental health competency in general practice training?: A SWOT analysis

2. Developing psychiatric resources for the new foundation programme curriculum

3. Five-point Likert items: t test versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon;Winter;Pract Assess Res Evaluat,2010

4. The evaluation of a mental health facilitator in general practice: effects on recognition, management, and outcome of mental illness;Bashir;Br J Gen Pract. Aug,2000

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3