Abstract
BackgroundThe clinical and social outcomes were evaluated of “difficult to place” (DTP) patients discharged from hospital to alternative facilities.MethodIn the course of a reprovision programme for a psychiatric hospital, 72 long-stay patients were considered to be too problematic to live within the usual range of community placements. Their clinical and social state was assessed shortly before the hospital closed. Severe, persistent behavioural problems were recorded for each subject at baseline. One year after being relocated, patients were reassessed.ResultsClinical and social measures were stable over time. The profile of severe behavioural problems changed over time, with one-third of the total problems subsiding and a similar number of new problems emerging. There was a significant reduction in physical aggression. One of the settings provided an environment as free of restrictions as the usual community homes.ConclusionsThe most difficult patients to reprovide for can be contained in a relatively non-restrictive care environment. There is some indication that aggressive behaviour can improve, raising the possibility that some DTP patients can move on to the usual community homes.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference6 articles.
1. The chronic psychiatric patient today;Bennett;Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,1980
2. Trieman N. & Leff J. (1996) The TAPS Project 24: Difficult to place patients in the course of closing a psychiatric hospital. Psychological Medicine (in press).
3. Leff J. , Trieman N. & Gooch C. (1996) The TAPS Project 33: Prospective follow-up study of long-stay patients discharged from two Victorian asylums. American Journal of Psychiatry (in press).
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献