Paroxetine versus Clomipramine in the Treatment of Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder

Author:

Zohar Joseph,Judge Rajinder,

Abstract

BackgroundThe aim was to assess the effect of a flexible dose of paroxetine, compared with clomipramine and placebo, in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).MethodIn a multinational randomised study, 406 subjects with OCD of at least six months duration received double-blind mediation for up to 12 weeks. Doses were adjusted according to therapeutic effect and side-effects. Primary efficacy measures were the Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale and the National Institute of Mental Health Obsessive–Compulsive Scale. Secondary efficacy measures were the Montgomery–åsberg Depression Rating Scale, Symptom Check-List (90), Clinical Global Impression, and Patients' Global Evaluation.ResultsParoxetine was significantly more effective than placebo, and of comparable efficacy to clomipramine. Paroxetine had significantly superior tolerability to clomipramine on three measures: CGI efficacy index, anticholinergic adverse events, and adverse events leading to withdrawal.ConclusionParoxetine is as effective as clomipramine in the treatment of OCD. The comparable efficacy and better tolerability of paroxetine suggest that it would be an appropriate treatment for OCD.

Publisher

Royal College of Psychiatrists

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference26 articles.

1. A double-blind placebo-controlled study of fluoxetine in patients with DSM–III–R obsessive–compulsive disorder. The Lilly European OCD Study Group;Greist;European Neuropsychopharmacology,1993

2. Results of a double-blind placebo-controlled trial of a new serotonin reuptake inhibitor, sertraline, in the treatment of obsessive–compulsive disorder;Chouinard;Psychopharmacology Bulletin,1990

3. Fluoxetine in the treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder

4. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale

5. Fluvoxamine versus clomipramine in the treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder, a multicenter, randomised, double-blind, parallel group comparison;Freeman;Journal of Clinical Psychiatry,1994

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3