Author:
Creed Francis,Black Dawn,Anthony Phil,Osborn Madeline,Thomas Phil,Franks David,Polley Richard,Lancashire Stuart,Saleem Packeerrowther,Tomenson Barbara
Abstract
Acutely ill patients presenting for admission in two district psychiatric services were randomly allocated to day-hospital or in-patient care. In both services a quarter of all admissions could not be allocated because they were too ill (half of these were compulsory admissions); these patients were predominantly manic and schizophrenic patients with pronounced psychotic symptoms and disturbed behaviour. In one service 80% (41/51) of patients randomly allocated to day-hospital treatment were successfully engaged in treatment compared with 54% (19/35) in the other service. This difference arose because only patients with mildly disturbed behaviour could be treated at the second day hospital. For patients who were successfully allocated, the outcome of treatment was similar in terms of psychiatric symptoms and social functioning. The results of a treatment trial for acutely ill patients in one district service cannot be generalised to other district services without due attention to the factors, such as staffing levels, which determine the degree of disturbed behaviour that can be tolerated in the day hospital.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference21 articles.
1. Lancet (1987) Drop-outs from clinical trials. Lancet, ii, 892–893.
2. Developments in Psychiatric Day Care
3. The Measurement of Social Behaviour in Psychiatric Patients: An Assessment of the Reliability and Validity of the SBS Schedule
4. An Expanding ‘Stage Army’ of Long-Stay Psychiatric Day-Patients
5. An evaluation of the applicability of the day hospital treatment of acutely disturbed patients;Zwerling;Israeli Annals of Psychiatry and Related Disciplines,1964
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献