Author:
Barker M. G.,Lawson J. S.
Abstract
The clinical examination of nominal aphasia has hitherto involved relatively unstandardized procedures. Random objects are presented to patients and account taken of their success or failure in finding the correct name (Allison, 1962). Recent work by Newcombe, Oldfield and Wingfield (1965) and Rochford and Williams (1962–1965) has drawn attention to a number of important variables affecting the likelihood of a correct response occurring. Oldfield (1966) in particular has presented a model of the psychological processes involved in object naming which raises a number of important theoretical questions concerning the nature of the deficit in nominal aphasia.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference6 articles.
1. Wingfield A. (1966). The Identification and Naming of Objects. D. Phil. Thesis, Oxford.
2. Allison R. S. (1962). The Senile Brain. London.
3. Things, Words and the Brain*
4. Object-naming by Dysphasic Patients
Cited by
72 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献