Author:
Barker J. C.,Thorpe J. G.
Abstract
The court hearing (Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee) showed that British psychiatrists disagreed about the best technique of administering electroplexy. The implications of this were discussed in a recent communication (1), which also contained an extensive review of the literature showing a similar disagreement amongst previous authorities. In order to ascertain which E.C.T. techniques were most widely practised in this country, a questionnaire was circulated to a number of mental and teaching hospitals and the results of this, which were reported in full (1, 3), are summarized in Table I.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Reference7 articles.
1. Controlled Trial of Straight and Modified Electroplexy
2. “A Comparative Study of Modified and Unmodified Electric Shock Treatment”;Havens;Dis Nerv. Syst.,1958
3. Electroplexy (E.C.T.) Techniques in Current use
4. “Risks Associated with Modified Electroplexy”;Lancet,1959
5. “Prolonged Apnoea following E.C.T. Modified by Suxethonium Bromide (Brevidil ‘E’)”;May;Ibid.,1959
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献