Author:
Ferdinand Robert F.,van der Reijden Matthias,Verhulst Frank C.,Nienhuis Fokko J.,Giel Robert
Abstract
BackgroundThe effectiveness of different assessment procedures for determining prevalence rates of psychiatric disorder in young adults was investigated.MethodIn a two-stage multi-method procedure, the Young Adult Self-Report, the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN), the Structured Interview for Personality Disorders (Revised), and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale were used to assess prevalence rates in 706 19–24-year-olds from the general population. Furthermore, individuals' subjective perception of distress and referral to mental health services were assessed.ResultsThe prevalence of any SCAN/DSM–III–R disorder was 19.3% (95% confidence interval: 11.2–27.4%). Most subjects who received a SCAN/DSM–III–R diagnosis were only mildly impaired. The highest prevalence rates of dysfunctioning (GAF score below 61) without referral to mental health services were for dissociative disorder (2.3%), sleep disorder (2.1 %), alcohol dependence (1.3%) and affective disorder (1.8%).ConclusionInstruments that assess functional impairment in addition to DSM–III–R diagnoses are indispensable in prevalence studies.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference21 articles.
1. Epidemiological aspects of psychiatric disorder in a Dutch health area
2. Measures in the day hospital. I. Global assessment of functioning scale;Dufton;International Journal of Partial Hospitalization,1992
3. Outcome of Depression and Anxiety in Primary Care
Cited by
36 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献