Abstract
Innovation agendas for care are increasingly flanked by demands for participatory and transdisciplinary approaches. However, especially in care robotics, it is difficult to shift the focus to early involvement of people and lifeworlds. We present the integrated methodology of a care robotics project and introduce inter- and transdisciplinary steps that help open up the development process even in an early project phase and adapt goals for robotic concepts to needs. We then discuss these steps in terms of their conceptual and practical research challenges.
Reference17 articles.
1. Bahadori, Shahram et al. (2003): RoboCare. An integrated robotic system for the domestic care of the ederly. In: Proceedings of workshop on Ambient Intelligence AI* IA-03, Pisa, Italy. Online verfügbar unter http://pst.istc.cnr.it/papers/AIIA_WS_paper.pdf, zuletzt geprüft am 26. 01. 2022.
2. Bedaf, Sandra et al. (2014): Which activities threaten independent living of elderly when becoming problematic. Inspiration for meaningful service robot functionality. In: Disability and Rehabilitation. In: Assistive Technology 9 (6), S. 445–452.
3. Bischof, Andreas (2017): Soziale Maschinen bauen. Epistemische Praktiken der Sozialrobotik. Bielefeld: transcript.
4. Bischof, Andreas; Freiermuth, Mira; Storz, Michael; Kurze, Albrecht; Berger, Arne (2020): Living Labs als Beispiel für die konzeptionellen Herausforderungen der Integration von Menschen in Technikentwicklung. In: Bruno Gransche und Arne Manzeschke (Hg.): Das geteilte Ganze. Horizonte integrierter Forschung für künftige Mensch-Technik-Verhältnisse. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, S. 285–304.
5. Decker, Michael; Weinberger, Nora; Krings, Bettina-Johanna; Hirsch, Johannes (2017): Imagined technology futures in demand-oriented technology assessment. In: Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2), S. 177–196.