Overpromising in science and technology: An evaluative conceptualization-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Overpromising in science and technology: An evaluative conceptualization

Published:2023-12-13 Issue:3 Volume:32 Page:60-65
ISSN:2567-8833
Container-title:TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis
language:
Short-container-title:TATuP

Author:

Gaillard Stefan^ORCID,Mody Cyrus^ORCID,Halffman Willem^ORCID

Abstract

This research article examines overpromising in scientific discourse that may raise unrealistic expectations in order to gain trust and funding. Drawing on signaling theory, philosophy of promising, and science communication research, a conceptualization of overpromising is presented. This conceptualization facilitates the evaluation of promises in science and technology and highlights the importance of the knowledge context. Further research is needed to explore the broader dimensions and motivations for overpromising.

Funder

European Research Council

Publisher

Oekom Publishers GmbH

Subject

General Medicine

Reference31 articles.

1. Bazerman, Charles (1988): Shaping written knowledge. The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

2. Booker, Richard; Boysen, Earl (2011): Nanotechnology for dummies. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

3. Bordignon, Fréderique et al. (2023): Nano bubbles. How, when and why does science fail to correct itself? https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7993122

4. Bucchi, Massimiano (1998): Science and the media. Alternative routes to scientific communications. New York, NY: Routledge.

5. Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science (2023): Contract with the EU and project start. Available online at https://ufm.dk/en/research-and-innovation/funding-programmes-for-research-and-innovation/eu-and-international-funding-programmes/horizon-europe/counselling/the-successful-application-to-horizon-europe/contract-with-the-eu-and-project-start, last accessed on 27. 10. 2023