Author:
Greischel Eva,Nagy Emilia,Conrad Alexander,Schäfer Martina
Abstract
This paper presents initial findings on the establishment of a social logistics project in a peripheral rural region in Germany. As part of a real-life laboratory, two services were developed and tested with the aim of improving rural supply: the delivery of regional goods and the return of online orders in cooperation with a regional public transport provider, regional retailers and parcel services. An evaluation team provided support to the project in identifying, monitoring, and documenting the societal impact of the services and promoted impact-oriented project management. The concept of providing services of general interest through social logistics and testing them in a real-world laboratory was based on preliminary work in the region. The results indicate that this approach can promote this type of social logistics in the long term. A social logistics approach does not focus solely on economic aspects but emphasises social and environmental benefits for the region. A real-world laboratory approach enables an environment that promotes open exchange, involvement of different stakeholders and joint problem solving in a reflective, iterative process. This methodological approach enabled the continuation and out-scaling of the service’s core offerings immediately after ending the test phase and is seen as an important prerequisite for establishing a long-term perspective.
Subject
Geography, Planning and Development
Reference38 articles.
1. ARL – Academy for Territorial Development in the Leibniz Association (2021): Rethinking the provision of public services and equivalent living conditions. Perspectives and fields of action. Hannover. = Positionspapier aus der ARL 125.
2. Bauer, S. (2009), Ansteigende Diversitäten ländlicher Räume? Schlussfolgerungen für die Regionalpolitik. In: Friedel, R.; Spindler, E.A. (eds.): Nachhaltige Entwicklung ländlicher Räume. Chancenverbesserung durch Innovation und Traditionspflege. Wiesbaden, 97–112.
3. Belcher, B.M.; Davel, R.; Claus, R. (2020): A refined method for theory-based evaluation of the societal impacts of research. In: MethodsX 7, 100788. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2020.100788
4. Bergmann, M.; Schäpke, N.; Marg, O.; Stelzer, F.; Lang, D.J.; Bossert, M.; Gantert, M.; Häußler, E.; Marquardt, E.; Piontek, F.M.; Potthast, T.; Rhodius, R.; Rudolph, M.; Ruddat, M.; Seebacher, A.; Sußmann, N. (2021): Transdisciplinary sustainability research in real-world labs: success factors and methods for change. In: Sustainability Science 16, 2, 541–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00886-8
5. BIEK – Bundesverband Paket- und Expresslogistik (2018): Kompendium Teil 5 – Zahlen – Daten – Fakten der KEP-Branche. https://www.biek.de/publikationen/faktenpapiere.html?page=2 (08.05.2023).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Daseinsvorsorge in ländlichen Räumen neu denken?;Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning;2024-04-30