Abstract
Close scrutiny of the ICT for Sustainability conference proceedings on digitalization and sustainability reveals a bias on (technological) efficiency solutions. This bias is mirrored in blind spots in the public discourse and the political debate. The sustainable transformation
of society calls for more comprehensive research ‐ and research funding ‐ to fill the gaps and integrate efficiency, consistency, and sufficiency strategies on the levels of life-cycle, enabling, and structural effects.In order to govern processes of digitalization for the
purpose of the common good, it is important to understand the opportunities and risks of information and communications technology (ICT) for a sustainable transformation of society. In this article, we systematically review 215 publications from the ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S) conference
corpus in order to investigate the state of debate. We analyze to what extent research covers sustainability implications of ICT, 1. regarding different levels of actions and effects, as well as 2. regarding the three different strategies of sustainability ‐ efficiency, consistency,
and sufficiency. We find that ICT4S research has a one-sided focus on digital efficiency improvements and on life-cycle impacts of ICT devices and applications. There is far less research on digitalization’s potential to advance sufficiency-oriented practices, and questions of
how to foster digital sustainability transformations at macro- and structural level are only marginally treated. We draw conclusions for funding and science politics.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
Reference124 articles.
1. Sensor-actuator smart lighting system: System organizational concept and challenges.;Al-Anbuky,2014
2. Smart metering infrastructure for residential water efficiency: Results of a trial in a behavioural change program in Perth, Western Australia.;Anda,2013
3. Discourses surrounding sustainability and digitalization in Europe on Twitter over time.;Angst;GAIA,2023
4. The acceptance of energy monitoring technologies: The case of local prosumers.;Barreto;Proceedings of the 6th international conference on ICT for Sustainability.,2019
5. Is there a role for mobiles to support sustainable agriculture in Africa?;Batchelor,2014
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献