No net land take policy in practice: Applications and potentials of planning instruments in municipalities. Results of an online survey in North Rhine-Westphalia

Author:

Eichhorn Sebastian,Adam Brigitte,Schürholt Kerstin,Baumann Stefan,Eichfuss Silas,Jansen Hendrik,Kötter Theo,Rohde Natascha,Stielike Jan Matthias,Terfrüchte Thomas,Wilberz Johannes

Abstract

In line with the European Commission’s target, land take in Germany has to be reduced to net zero by 2050. This not only presupposes greater inner urban development and more efficient development outside existing settlements, but also puts a greater planning and political focus on renaturation. The aim of this paper is to investigate the implementation of no net land take policy using the example of the highly dense and urbanised federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany. Based on an online survey, the current and potential use of (planning) instruments to implement this policy in all 396 municipalities in North Rhine-Westphalia was investigated. The findings suggest that the municipalities are not yet in a position to consistently implement no net land take. Particularly in the field of renaturation, this is often due to a lack of experience and uncertainties in the use of the existing (planning) instruments, but also to lacking awareness of the problem and a lack of political and social acceptance for higher housing densities. Since the necessary instruments are defined in current legislation and the concepts for implementation are generally known, it is important to support municipalities in using the available instruments and concepts even without direct pressure to act.

Publisher

Oekom Publishers GmbH

Subject

Geography, Planning and Development

Reference61 articles.

1. Ahlfeldt, G.; Pietrostefani, E.; Schumann, A.; Matsumoto, T. (2018): Demystifying compact urban growth: Evidence from 300 studies from across the world. Paris. = OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2018/03. https://doi.org/10.1787/bbea8b78-en

2. Altrock, U. (2022): New (sub)urbanism? How German cities try to create “urban” neighborhoods in their outskirts as a contribution to solving their recent housing crises. In: Urban Governance 2, 1, 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2022.04.001

3. Ammann, I.; Brack, N.; Claßen, G.; Degener, E.; Duvernet, C.; Franke, J.; Lihs, V.; Neußer, W.; Nielsen, J.; Oettgen, N.; Rein, S.; Schmidt, C.F.; Schürt, A.; Waltersbacher, M.; Zander, C. (2021): Wohnungs- und Immobilienmärkte in Deutschland 2020. Bonn.

4. BBR – Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung (2004): Fläche im Kreis. Kreislaufwirtschaft in der städtischen/stadtregionalen Flächennutzung. Bonn. = ExWoSt-Informationen 25/1.

5. BBR – Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung (ed.) (2007): Perspektive Flächenkreislaufwirtschaft. Kreislaufwirtschaft in der städtischen/stadtregionalen Flächennutzung. Fläche im Kreis. Ein ExWoSt-Forschungsfeld. Band 3: Neue Instrumente für neue Ziele. Bonn.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3