Author:
Eichhorn Sebastian,Adam Brigitte,Schürholt Kerstin,Baumann Stefan,Eichfuss Silas,Jansen Hendrik,Kötter Theo,Rohde Natascha,Stielike Jan Matthias,Terfrüchte Thomas,Wilberz Johannes
Abstract
In line with the European Commission’s target, land take in Germany has to be reduced to net zero by 2050. This not only presupposes greater inner urban development and more efficient development outside existing settlements, but also puts a greater planning and political focus on renaturation. The aim of this paper is to investigate the implementation of no net land take policy using the example of the highly dense and urbanised federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany. Based on an online survey, the current and potential use of (planning) instruments to implement this policy in all 396 municipalities in North Rhine-Westphalia was investigated. The findings suggest that the municipalities are not yet in a position to consistently implement no net land take. Particularly in the field of renaturation, this is often due to a lack of experience and uncertainties in the use of the existing (planning) instruments, but also to lacking awareness of the problem and a lack of political and social acceptance for higher housing densities. Since the necessary instruments are defined in current legislation and the concepts for implementation are generally known, it is important to support municipalities in using the available instruments and concepts even without direct pressure to act.
Subject
Geography, Planning and Development
Reference61 articles.
1. Ahlfeldt, G.; Pietrostefani, E.; Schumann, A.; Matsumoto, T. (2018): Demystifying compact urban growth: Evidence from 300 studies from across the world. Paris. = OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2018/03. https://doi.org/10.1787/bbea8b78-en
2. Altrock, U. (2022): New (sub)urbanism? How German cities try to create “urban” neighborhoods in their outskirts as a contribution to solving their recent housing crises. In: Urban Governance 2, 1, 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2022.04.001
3. Ammann, I.; Brack, N.; Claßen, G.; Degener, E.; Duvernet, C.; Franke, J.; Lihs, V.; Neußer, W.; Nielsen, J.; Oettgen, N.; Rein, S.; Schmidt, C.F.; Schürt, A.; Waltersbacher, M.; Zander, C. (2021): Wohnungs- und Immobilienmärkte in Deutschland 2020. Bonn.
4. BBR – Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung (2004): Fläche im Kreis. Kreislaufwirtschaft in der städtischen/stadtregionalen Flächennutzung. Bonn. = ExWoSt-Informationen 25/1.
5. BBR – Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung (ed.) (2007): Perspektive Flächenkreislaufwirtschaft. Kreislaufwirtschaft in der städtischen/stadtregionalen Flächennutzung. Fläche im Kreis. Ein ExWoSt-Forschungsfeld. Band 3: Neue Instrumente für neue Ziele. Bonn.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献