Affiliation:
1. Saint Petersburg State University
Abstract
In the given article, the author tries to defi ne historicism as an eff ective scientifi c principle in the fi eld of humanities, namely in the modern sociology of science. Trying to solve this task, the author focuses his attention on the B. Latour and G. Harman’s discussion on the essence of material objects. Analyzing their positions, the author
states that despite initially diff erent philosophical attitudes, both thinkers consider the subject of their research in a historicist way, that is, as dynamic and changeable in the course of the time. This way of thinking, in turn, forces them to solve their program tasks, using the instruments which were developed in the frame of classical historicist
thought. So B. Latour chooses to use the historicist methodology and G. Harman, in turn, reproduces its specific ontology. Taking into consideration the results of the study and opinions of domestic and foreign researchers, the author concludes that despite the destructive criticism of postmodernism, historicism still remains a kind of organizing
principle in humanities, which doesn’t only set the context of modern discussions, but also forms prospects for further development.
Funder
Russian Science Foundation
Publisher
Chelyabinsk State University
Reference13 articles.
1. Vyatkin DI. Plasma in Itself: Between Ontology and Epistemology. Logos. 2017;27(3):57-82. (In Russ.).
2. Dyakov AV. Historicism as Methodology: Humanities and Criticism. In: Proceedings of the XIV International Scientifi c-Theoretical Conference “Communicative Strategies of the Information Society”; 2022 Nov 17–18; St. Petersburg. St. Petersburg, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University; 2022. Рр. 33–35. (In Russ.).
3. Erofeeva MA. Actor-Network Theory: Object-Oriented Sociology without Objects? Logos. 2017;27(3):83-112. (In Russ.).
4. Kornienko AG. Reception of the Ontology of Historicism in Post-Anthropology. In: Proceedings of the XX International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists in the Field of Humanities and Social Sciences “Languages and Meanings”; 2022 Oct 25–27; Novosibirsk. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State University; 2022. Рр. 85–88. (In Russ.).
5. Latour B. When Things Strike Back: Possible Contribution of “Science Studies” to Social Sciences. MSU Vestnik. Ser. 7: Filosofi a. 2003;(3):20-39. (In Russ.).