HISTORICISM AS A GENERAL SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPLE IN A MODERN SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENCE

Author:

Kornienko Aleksei1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Saint Petersburg State University

Abstract

In the given article, the author tries to defi ne historicism as an eff ective scientifi c principle in the fi eld of humanities, namely in the modern sociology of science. Trying to solve this task, the author focuses his attention on the B. Latour and G. Harman’s discussion on the essence of material objects. Analyzing their positions, the author states that despite initially diff erent philosophical attitudes, both thinkers consider the subject of their research in a historicist way, that is, as dynamic and changeable in the course of the time. This way of thinking, in turn, forces them to solve their program tasks, using the instruments which were developed in the frame of classical historicist thought. So B. Latour chooses to use the historicist methodology and G. Harman, in turn, reproduces its specific ontology. Taking into consideration the results of the study and opinions of domestic and foreign researchers, the author concludes that despite the destructive criticism of postmodernism, historicism still remains a kind of organizing principle in humanities, which doesn’t only set the context of modern discussions, but also forms prospects for further development.

Funder

Russian Science Foundation

Publisher

Chelyabinsk State University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference13 articles.

1. Vyatkin DI. Plasma in Itself: Between Ontology and Epistemology. Logos. 2017;27(3):57-82. (In Russ.).

2. Dyakov AV. Historicism as Methodology: Humanities and Criticism. In: Proceedings of the XIV International Scientifi c-Theoretical Conference “Communicative Strategies of the Information Society”; 2022 Nov 17–18; St. Petersburg. St. Petersburg, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University; 2022. Рр. 33–35. (In Russ.).

3. Erofeeva MA. Actor-Network Theory: Object-Oriented Sociology without Objects? Logos. 2017;27(3):83-112. (In Russ.).

4. Kornienko AG. Reception of the Ontology of Historicism in Post-Anthropology. In: Proceedings of the XX International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists in the Field of Humanities and Social Sciences “Languages and Meanings”; 2022 Oct 25–27; Novosibirsk. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State University; 2022. Рр. 85–88. (In Russ.).

5. Latour B. When Things Strike Back: Possible Contribution of “Science Studies” to Social Sciences. MSU Vestnik. Ser. 7: Filosofi a. 2003;(3):20-39. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3