Pharmacists' and mentors' views on the introduction of pharmacist supplementary prescribing: a qualitative evaluation of views and context

Author:

Lloyd Fran1,Hughes Carmel M2

Affiliation:

1. Northern Ireland Centre for Postgraduate Pharmaceutical Education and Training, School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK

2. School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK

Abstract

Abstract Objective Supplementary prescribing has been a major policy initiative in the UK, which has seen pharmacists and nurses assume greater responsibility for prescribing in collaboration with doctors. This study explored the views and professional context of pharmacists and physicians (who acted as their training mentors), prior to the start of supplementary prescribing training. Setting Primary and secondary healthcare settings in Northern Ireland. Method All pharmacists (n = 63) from the first four cohorts enrolled for supplementary prescribing training in Northern Ireland were invited to participate in a series of focus groups, while mentors (n = 54) were asked to participate in face-to-face semi-structured interviews; the research took place between September 2003 and April 2005. All discussions/interviews were audiotaped and transcribed, and analysed using constant comparison. Key findings Nine pharmacist focus groups were convened (number per group ranging from 4 to 8; total n = 47) and 35 semi-structured interviews with mentors were conducted. The four main themes that emerged were internal drivers, benefits and concerns, relationships, and beyond the current professional comfort zone. Supplementary prescribing was broadly welcomed by both professional groups and was anticipated to produce improvements in patient care and interprofessional relationships, but there were some concerns about loss of diversity, deskilling of junior doctors, safety and professional encroachment. Caution was expressed with regard to a further extension of prescribing rights, particularly in relation to the role of pharmacists in diagnosis and independent prescribing decision making. Conclusion Although supplementary prescribing was viewed positively, these findings should be considered in the light of more recent developments in prescribing rights for other health professionals, including pharmacists.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacy

Reference27 articles.

1. Review of prescribing, supply and administration of medicines;Crown Report,1999

2. Supplementary prescribing by nurses and pharmacists with the NHS in England: a guide for implementation,2003

3. Supplementary prescribing by nurses and pharmacists within the HPSS in Northern Ireland: a guide for implementation;Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety,2004

4. First fourteen prescribers registered by Society;Anon;Pharm J,2004

5. Hospital doctors' perceived barriers to pharmacist prescribing;Child;Int J Pharm Pract,1999

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3