Medication reviews provided by general medical practitioners (GPs) and nurses: an evaluation of their quality

Author:

Krska Janet1,Ross Susan M2,Watts Michelle2

Affiliation:

1. Tayside Primary Care Trust, Scotland, UK

2. Kirriemuir Health Centre, Angus, Scotland, UK

Abstract

Abstract Objective To train general medical practitioners (GPs) and nurses in providing medication review services in the primary care setting and to evaluate the reviews provided. Setting One medical practice in Scotland with five whole-time equivalent (WTE) GP partners, two practice nurses and six community-based nurses. Method Training for GPs was provided as a group session plus individual supported clinic sessions. Nurse training consisted of a group session only. Patients aged over 75 were invited to attend the medical practice to receive a medication review. Output measures were: number of patients with pharmaceutical care issues (PCIs) documented, changes made to repeat medicines and computer records, monitoring undertaken, number of PCIs, PCIs identifiable from notes and records but not documented (‘missed’ PCIs). A sample of GP reviews provided before training and all GP and nurse reviews during training were evaluated. Key findings In 45 case note reviews provided prior to training, GPs documented PCIs in 20% of patients; average 0.3 per patient, but missed 1.75 per patient. In 56 reviews provided during training, they documented PCIs in 98% of patients; average 3.0 per patient, missing 0.8 per patient. The proportion of patients with changes to drug therapy or monitoring carried out during training increased significantly compared to pre-training reviews. Nurses documented PCIs in 97% of 33 patients reviewed, average 1.5 PCIs per patient, but missed 0.8. The mean number of repeat drugs prescribed reduced from 4.73 to 4.42 per patient after nurse review, but increased after GP review from 4.07 to 4.18. Conclusion After training, both GPs and nurses identified PCIs appropriate to their expertise. The sustainability of this effect in the longer term is not known. Since all patients should have repeat medication reviewed regularly, involving these professionals in providing routine reviews would allow pharmacist medication review clinics to be optimised.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacy

Reference43 articles.

1. Who controls repeats;Zermansky;Br J Gen Pract,1996

2. Repeat prescribing management — a cause for concern;McGavock;Br J Gen Pract,1999

3. Quality of care for elderly residents in nursing homes and elderly people living at home: controlled observational study;Fahey;BMJ,2003

4. Inappropriate drug use among community-dwelling elderly;Hanlon;Pharmacotherapy,2000

5. Potentially inappropriate medication use in the community-dwelling elderly: findings from the 1966 Medical Expenditure Survey Panel;Zhan;JAMA,2001

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3