Affiliation:
1. FEARP/USP
2. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Abstract
How can we measure the welfare benefit of ongoing stabilization policies? We develop a methodology to calculate the welfare cost of business cycles taking into account that observed consumption is partially smoothed. We propose a decomposition that disentangles consumption in a mix of laissez-faire (absent policies) and riskless components. With a novel identification strategy, we estimate the span of stabilization power. In our preferred specification, we find that the welfare cost of total fluctuations is 11 percent of lifetime consumption, of which 82 percent is smoothed by the status quo policies, yielding a residual 1.8 percent of consumption to be tackled by policymakers.
Publisher
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Reference35 articles.
1. 1. Alvarez, Fernando and Urban J. Jermann (2004). "Using asset prices to measure the cost of business cycles." Journal of Political Economy, 112(6), pp. 1223-1256. doi:10.1086/424738.
2. 2. Bai, Jushan and Pierre Perron (1998). "Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes." Econometrica, 66(1), pp. 47-78. doi:10.2307/2998540.
3. 3. Bai, Jushan and Pierre Perron (2003). "Critical values for multiple structural change tests." The Econometrics Journal, 6(1), pp. 72-78. doi:10.1111/1368-423X.00102.
4. 4. Balke, Nathan S. and Robert J. Gordon (1989). "The estimation of prewar gross national product." Journal of Political Economy, 97(1), pp. 38-92. doi:10.1086/261593.
5. 5. Barlevy, Gadi (2005). "The cost of business cycles and the benefits of stabilization." In Economic Perspectives, pp. 32-49. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. URL https://www.chicagofed.org/publications/economic-perspectives/2005/1qtr2005-part3-barlevy.