Affiliation:
1. Toronto Metropolitan University
2. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Abstract
A recent literature within quantitative macroeconomics has advocated the use of continuous-time methods for dynamic programming problems. In this paper we explore the relative merits of continuous-time and discrete-time methods within the context of stationary and nonstationary income fluctuation problems. For stationary problems in two dimensions, the continuous-time approach is both more stable and typically faster than the discrete-time approach for any given level of accuracy. In contrast, for convex lifecycle problems (in which age or time enters explicitly), simply iterating backwards from the terminal date in discrete time is superior to any continuous-time algorithm. However, we also show that the continuous-time framework can easily incorporate nonconvexities and multiple controls—complications that often require either problem-specific ingenuity or nonlinear root-finding in the discrete-time context. In general, neither approach unequivocally dominates the other, making the choice of one over the other an art, rather than an exact science.
Code can be found at https://github.com/tphelanECON/The Art of Temporal Approximation WP.
Publisher
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Reference32 articles.
1. 1. Yves Achdou, Jiequn Han, Jean-Michel Lasry, Pierre-Louis Lions, and Benjamin Moll. Income and Wealth Distribution in Macroeconomics: A Continuous-Time Approach. The Review of Economic Studies, 89(1):45-86, January 2022. doi:10.1093/restud/rdab002.
2. 2. S. Rao Aiyagari. Uninsured Idiosyncratic Risk and Aggregate Saving. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(3):659-684, 1994. doi:10.2307/2118417.
3. 3. Laurence Ales, Roozbeh Hosseini, and Larry E. Jones. Is There "Too Much" Inequality in Health Spending Across Income Groups? Working Paper 17937, National Bureau of Economic Research, March 2012.
4. 4. Francisco Barillas and Jesus Fernandez-Villaverde. A generalization of the endogenous grid method. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31(8):2698-2712, August 2007. doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2006.08.005.
5. 5. G. Barles and P. E. Souganidis. Convergence of approximation schemes for fully nonlinear second order equations. Asymptotic Analysis, 4(3):271-283, January 1991. doi:10.3233/ASY-1991-4305.