Affiliation:
1. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Abstract
This paper studies how design features influence the success of Housing Mobility Programs (HMPs) in reducing racial segregation. Targeting neighborhoods based on previous residents' outcomes does not allow for targeting race-specific outcomes, generates uncertainty when targeting income-specific outcomes, and generates bias in ranking neighborhoods' effects. Moreover, targeting opportunity bargains based on previous residents' outcomes selects tracts with large disagreements in current and previous residents' outcomes, with such disagreements predicted by sorting since 1990. HMP success is aided by the ability to port vouchers across jurisdictions, access to cars, and relaxing supply constraints, perhaps by targeting lower-ranked neighborhoods.
This paper incorporates content from two previous working papers, one under the same title (WP 20-36) and the other circulated as "Neighborhood Sorting Obscures Neighborhood Effects in the Opportunity Atlas" (WP 20-37).
Publisher
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Reference130 articles.
1. The spending and debt response to minimum wage hikes;Aaronson;American Economic Review,2012
2. 2. Aaronson, D., D. Hartley, and B. Mazumder (2021). The effects of the 1930s HOLC "redlining" maps. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 13(4), 355-92. DOI: 10.1257/pol.20190414.
3. 3. Agostinelli, F., M. Doepke, G. Sorrenti, and F. Zilibotti (2020). It takes a village: The economics of parenting with neighborhood and peer effects. NBER Working Paper 27050. DOI: 10.3386/w27050.
4. 4. Agostinelli, F., M. Luflade, and P. Martellini (2021). On the spatial determinants of educational access. HCEO Working Paper 2021-042. https://ideas.repec.org/p/hka/wpaper/2021-042.html.
5. 5. Ajunwa, I. (2019). The paradox of automation as anti-bias intervention. Cardozo L. Rev. 41, 1671.