Affiliation:
1. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
2. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Abstract
We use microdata on the phases of commercial construction projects to document three facts regarding time-to-plan lags: (1) plan times are long - about 1.5 years - and highly variable, (2) roughly 40 percent of projects are abandoned in planning, and (3) property price appreciation reduces the likelihood of abandonment. We construct a model with endogenous planning starts and abandonment that matches these facts. The model has the testable implication that supply is more elastic when there are more "shovel ready" projects available to advance to construction. We use local projections to validate that this prediction holds in the cross-section for US cities.
Publisher
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Reference18 articles.
1. "The microgeography of housing supply;Baum-Snow;" Journal of Political Economy 132(6),2024
2. "A new method of estimating risk aversion;Chetty;" American Economic Review 96(5),2006
3. "Time to plan and aggregate fluctuations;Christiano;" Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 20(1),1996
4. 4. Del Boca, Alessandra, Marzio Galeotti, Charles P Himmelberg, and Paola Rota (2008). "Investment and time to plan and build: A comparison of structures vs. equipment in a panel of Italian firms." Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(4), pp. 864-889. https://www.doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.4.864.
5. 5. Edge, Rochelle M (2007). "Time-to-build, time-to-plan, habit-persistence, and the liquidity effect." Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(6), pp. 1644-1669. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2006.07.003.