Affiliation:
1. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Abstract
Some argue that the Fed underreacted to rising inflation in 2021 after the US economy started to recover from the COVID-19 crisis. By using data from the Summary of Economic Projections (SEP), we surmise that the FOMC expected to keep the federal funds rate near zero by the end of 2021, but at the same time, the committee also expected to make the policy rate catch up to inflation over the next two years. We then argue that the Fed chose this gradual approach in response to the negative demand shock that pushed the policy rate to its effective zero lower bound. Economic literature on optimal monetary policy suggests that this policy approach is optimal in an event such as the COVID-19 crisis.
Publisher
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Reference10 articles.
1. 1. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 2020. "2020 Statement on Longer-Run Goals and Monetary Policy Strategy." https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/review-of-monetary-policy-strategy-tools-and-communications-statement-on-longer-run-goals-monetary-policy-strategy.htm.
2. 2. Clarida, Richard, Jordi Galí, and Mark Gertler. 1999. "The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective." Journal of Economic Literature 37 (4): 1661-1707. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.4.1661.
3. 3. Coibion, Olivier, Yuriy Gorodnichenko, Edward S. Knotek II, and Raphael S. Schoenle. Forthcoming. "Average Inflation Targeting and Household Expectations." Journal of Political Economy Macroeconomics. https://doi.org/10.1086/722962.
4. 4. Eggertsson, Gauti B., and Michael Woodford. 2003. "The Zero Bound on Interest Rates and Optimal Monetary Policy." Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 34 (1): 139-233. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2003.0010.
5. 5. Gordon, Matthew V., and Todd E. Clark. 2023. "The Impacts of Supply Chain Disruptions on Inflation." Economic Commentary, no. 2023-08 (May). https://doi.org/10.26509/frbc-ec-202308.