Abstract
Design-build method has become a more popular procurement method in Indonesia. This method differs from other conventional procurement methods because the design and construction is one entity. All responsibilities are taken over by contractors so that the project outcome expected becomes more comprehensive. Design -build applies fast-track system. The work acceleration implemented during the construction will potentially generate risks on the performance, in this case quality performance. The implementation of risk management is expected to significantly reduce the impact of the risk on the quality performance of a project. The objective of this study is to analyze risks (the frequency and the impact) by identifying factors affecting the success of work acceleration, and thus work acceleration strategy can be developed for design-build project in order to improve risk based quality. This study is a qualitative research with literature study on factors of risks affecting quality performance and questioners given to experts and respondents who are experienced in design-build procurement. Risk factors analyzed in this study are competence of project owner, team leader, and project manager, planning and execution ability, procurement process, scope and nature of the project, work relationship among project teams, project owner’s information, physical factors, and social economy environment. The result of this study is work acceleration strategy on design-build project in order to improve risk based quality performance.
Reference27 articles.
1. A. Lesniak, E. Plebankiewicz, and K. Zima, “Design and build procurement system - Contractor selection,” Arch. Civ. Eng., vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 463–476, 2012.
2. K. R. Molenaar, A. D. Songer, and M. Barash, “Pubuc-sector design/build evolution and performance,” Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 15, no. 2. pp. 54–62, 1999.
3. A. Ghadamsi, “Criteria for Selection of Design and Build Procurement Method,” Research Gate, 2016, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303818282_Criteria_For_Selection_Of_Design_And_Build_Procurement_Method
4. R. E. Minchin, X. Li, R. R. Issa, and G. G. Vargas, “Comparison of cost and time performance of design-build and design-bid-build delivery systems in Florida,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 139, no. 10, 2013.
5. H. Adnan, F. Bachik, A. Supardi, and M. A. Marhani, “Success Factors of Design and Build Projects in Public Universities,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 35, pp. 170–179, 2012.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献