Evaluation of a Method to Induce Hydrophobicity on Sand

Author:

McMillan Mica1,Williams Karen1,Moore Kimberly1,Daroub Samira2,Erickson John E.3,Kostka Stanley4,Fidanza Michael4

Affiliation:

1. Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 3205 College Avenue, Davie, FL 33314, USA

2. Belle Glade Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 3200 E. Canal Street, Belle Glade, FL 33430, USA

3. UF/IFAS Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA

4. Berks Campus, Pennsylvania State University, 111 Luerssen Building, Reading, PA 19160, USA

Abstract

Methods to evaluate soil water repellency (SWR) require extensive studies on field soils and are subject to the heterogeneity of SWR throughout the soil profile as well as plant/soil interactions. The objectives of this study were to develop a synthetic method to create hydrophobic sand, and to determine if that hydrophobic sand would affect the establishment of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L. Pers. × C. transvaalensis Burtt-Davy, cv. Tifeagle) sprigs. Two techniques were developed to render sand hydrophobic: soap:sand method (hydrophobic sand; HSS) and sand:peat method (hydrophobic sand and read sedge peat; HSP). Both HSS and HSP remained severely hydrophobic at 0 cm depth for only 7 d, and at the 1- to 6-cm depth for 77 continuous days, as determined by water drop penetration time. Bermudagrass establishment, root growth, or shoot growth in two greenhouse experiments with four root zone substrates–HSS, HSP, WSAND (wettable sand), and WSP (wettable sand and reed sedge peat)—were not consistent. In conclusion, both HSS and HSP were shown to be safe and effective methods to synthetically produce hydrophobic sand for potential use in laboratory research, but further evaluation is needed to determine the feasibility of using HSS and HSP for turfgrass growth evaluations.

Publisher

American Society for Horticultural Science

Subject

Horticulture

Reference34 articles.

1. Preferential flow in water repellent sands;Bauters TW,1998

2. Boyle K, Leifer K. 2002. United States Environmental Protection Agency. IIFG decision documents on reassessment of exemptions form the requirement of a tolerance for fatty acids. https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/cleared_reviews/csr_PC-079029_31-Jul-02_a.pdf. [accessed 1 Mar 2022].

3. Clay spreading on water repellent sands in the southeast of South Australia—promoting sustainable agriculture;Cann MA,2000

4. The occurrence and alleviation by surfactants of soil water repellency on sand-based turfgrass systems;Cisar JC,2000

5. Cloyd R. 2022. Fundamental of using soaps as insecticides. Kansas State University Extension Entomology. https://blogs.k-state.edu/kansasbugs/2020/06/12/fundamentals-of-using-soaps-as-insecticides/. [accessed 1 Mar 2022].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3