Affiliation:
1. U.S. Geological Survey, Geology, Minerals, Energy and Geophysics Science Center, 2255 N. Gemini Dr., Flagstaff, Arizona, USA, 86001
Abstract
Abstract
The middle Eocene lower Coaledo Formation was interpreted as ten shoaling upward delta-margin cycles based on sediments and macrofauna. The strata, however, contains deep-water foraminifers. Explanations to resolve this anomaly included reworking, bathymetric range extension, or upward migration of water masses. Paleoecology analysis of foraminifers indicates that the few shelf species are poorly preserved whereas the well-preserved lower bathyal species dominate, and planktic organisms are present. Evidence for reworking, bathymetric range extension, or upward migration of water masses was not found in any of the cycles. The paleoecologic utility of hummocky cross-bedded sandstones is questioned as these features are controversial. In addition, there is no evidence of sea-level changes or tectonic activity to accommodate the bathymetric changes needed. Deposition of the lower Coaledo Formation on a submarine fan at lower bathyal depths eliminates the need to explain bathymetric anomalies or lack of tectonic movement.
Publisher
Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research
Reference112 articles.
1. Chapter 5 - Paleoenvironmental Synthesis, Cenozoic Foraminifera and Calcareous Nannofossil Biostratigraphy of the Niger Delta;Adegoke,,2017
2. Turnover and stability in the deep sea: Benthic foraminifera as tracers of Paleogene global change;Alegret,;Global and Planetary Change,2021
3. Benthic foraminiferal responses to absence of fresh phytodetritus: A two-year experiment;Alve,;Marine Micropaleontology,2010
4. Correlation and ages of Cenozoic chronostratigraphic units in Oregon and Washington;Armentrout,,1981
5. Tectonics and paleogeography of a post-accretionary forearc basin, Coos Bay area, SW Oregon, USA;Armentrout,,2021