Errors in Radar CMP Velocity Estimates Due to Survey Geometry, and Their Implication for Ice Water Content Estimation

Author:

Barrett Brian Edward123,Murray Tavi123,Clark Roger123

Affiliation:

1. School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K.

2. School of the Environment and Society, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, U.K.

3. School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K.

Abstract

The accuracy of velocity determination from common mid-point (CMP) ground penetrating radar surveys has been assessed in the past and found to be sufficient for migration and depth determination. Increasingly, these velocities are also being used to quantify subsurface physical properties such as water content. This paper demonstrates that small errors in measured velocity can result in large errors in these derived properties. We have evaluated the size of some error sources with specific reference to a given glaciological model and common glaciological survey conditions. At worst, large static errors and 3% errors in measured offset result in interval velocity errors of [Formula: see text]. This error is large enough that derived water content has an error greater than 80% (e.g., [Formula: see text] volumetric % water). Common acquisition and processing practices result in [Formula: see text] interval velocity errors (corresponding to [Formula: see text] error in water content, e.g., [Formula: see text] volumetric %); best practices could result in errors as low as [Formula: see text] in interval velocity (corresponding to [Formula: see text] error in water content, e.g., [Formula: see text] volumetric %), but to achieve this level of precision requires a revision of common practice for CMP acquisition and processing. This revision would need to result in improved assignment of time zero and a consistent definition of reflection event arrival time (to provide travel time errors smaller than 0.5%), and accurate measurement of CMP geometry.

Publisher

Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society

Subject

Geophysics,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Environmental Engineering

Reference19 articles.

1. Modelling of GPR waves for lossy media obeying a complex power law of frequency for dielectric permittivity

2. Estimation of water content in a temperate glacier from radar and seismic sounding data

3. A. D. Booth, R. A. Clark, and T. Murray, 2006, Semblance analyses for the design and interpretation of common mid-point GPR surveys: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar Columbus, Ohio, USA, Jun 19–22.

4. Wave field migration as a tool for estimating spatially continuous radar velocity and water content in glaciers

5. SEISMIC VELOCITIES FROM SURFACE MEASUREMENTS

Cited by 40 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3