Affiliation:
1. Key Laboratory of Surficial Geochemistry, Ministry of Education, School of Earth science and Engineering, Nanjing university 1 , Nanjing , China
2. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Shengli Oilfield, SINOPEC 2 , Dongying , China
Abstract
Abstract
The physical properties of shale oil reservoirs under overburden pressure are of great significance for reservoir prediction and evaluation during exploration and development. Based on core, thin section, and SEM observations, as well as test data such as XRD, TOC, and porosity and permeability under pressure conditions, this study systematically analyzes the variation of physical properties of different lithofacies shales in the Jiyang depression and the influence of rock fabric on the physical variation under pressure. The porosity and permeability of shale samples significantly decrease under pressure. According to the phased reduction in porosity and permeability, the pressurization process is divided into three pressure stages: low pressure (<8 MPa), medium pressure (8–15 MPa), and high pressure (>15 MPa). The reduction of porosity is fastest in the low-pressure stage and slowest in the medium-pressure stage. The reduction of permeability is fastest in the low-pressure stage and the slowest in the high-pressure stage. The rock fabric has a significant impact on porosity and permeability under pressure conditions. The permeability of laminated shale and bedded shale is higher than that of massive shale under pressure, and the permeability loss rate is lower than that of massive shales. Especially under lower pressure, the difference can be 10–20 times. In addition, the reduction rate of porosity and permeability under pressure is negatively correlated with felsic minerals content, which is positively correlated with carbonate minerals content and clay minerals content. The contribution of clay minerals to the porosity reduction rate is dominant, followed by carbonate minerals. The contribution of carbonate minerals to the permeability reduction rate is dominant, followed by clay minerals. The TOC content has no significant impact on the porosity and permeability of shales under pressure in the study due to the low maturity.
Reference49 articles.
1. “Unconventional shale-gas systems; the Mississippian Barnett shale of North-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment,”;Jarvie;AAPG Bulletin,2007
2. “Hydrocarbon potential of the Barnett shale (Mississippian), Delaware Basin, West Texas and southeastern New Mexico,”;Kinley;AAPG Bulletin,2008
3. “Research progress and key scientific issues of continental shale oil in China,”;Jin;Acta Petrolei Sinica,2021
4. “Formation and distribution potential of global shale oil and the developments of continental shale oil theory and technology in China,”;Zou;Earth Science Frontiers,2023
5. “Significant progress of continental petroleum geological theory in basins of central and Western China,”;Jia;Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018