Author:
Martins Rui,Large Samuel,Russell Rachel,Surmay Gary,Connolly Mark
Abstract
Background: Migraine is a highly prevalent and incapacitating neurological disorder associated with the highest global disability burden in people aged 15 to 49 years. Europe has the fourth-highest prevalence of migraine, after North America, South America, and Central America, and above Asia and Africa. Migraine leads to relatively modest direct healthcare expenditure but has substantial indirect costs due to reduced productivity. Methods: The economic burden of migraine was estimated in comparison with the general population of the United Kingdom (UK) using an analytical fiscal modeling framework applying the government cost perspective. Published measures of migraine’s impact on labor participation were applied to rates of economic activity/inactivity of the general population. The model estimates lifetime changes to earnings from employment, direct and indirect taxes paid, and financial support requirements over the life course. Incremental differences between those affected and unaffected by migraine are reported as net fiscal consequences to public accounts. Fiscal costs are reported as the discounted average per capita over a 20-year time horizon and for the entire annual UK cohort with prevalent migraine. Results: People affected by migraine are more likely to be absent from work, unemployed, and disabled, and to retire early. A 44-year-old individual affected by migraine was associated with £19 823 in excess fiscal costs to the UK government, £1379 per year living with the condition, compared with someone not affected by the disease. Annually, migraine was estimated to represent £12.20 billion to the public economy, approximately £130.63 per migraine episode. The model predicted annual productivity losses in the health and social care workforce to be £2.05 billion and total annual productivity losses to be over £5.81 billion. Conclusions: This fiscal analysis monetizes the occupational consequences of migraine to the UK government, both in terms of lost tax revenue and transfer payments. The findings are substantial and useful to characterize disease severity and to inform the body of evidence considered by decision makers appraising the cost-effectiveness of health technologies.
Publisher
The Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference71 articles.
1. García-Gómez P, Van Kippersluis H, O'Donnell O, Van Doorslaer E. Long-term and spillover effects of health shocks on employment and income. J Hum Resour. 2013;48(4):873-909.
2. Lenhart O. The effects of health shocks on labor market outcomes: evidence from UK panel data. Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20(1):83-98. doi:10.1007/s10198-018-0985-z
3. European Migraine & Headache Alliance. Call to action for a comprehensive EU action on migraine. Accessed August 30, 2022. https://www.emhalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/EMHA-Call-to-Action-Final-1.pdf
4. American Migraine Foundation. Comorbidities of migraine. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://americanmigrainefoundation.org/resource-library/comorbidities-of-migraine/
5. World Health Organization. Headache disorders. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/headache-disorders