Affiliation:
1. California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Abstract
Angler demographics and behaviors have a significant impact on recreational fishery-dependent data, and recently, human dimensions have become more widely recognized as an important part of fisheries management. California’s steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) report card program has served to track recreational fishing effort and catch each calendar year for management purposes through angler self-reporting. However, angler report card return rates are consistently low, and there has been no recent effort to investigate angler attributes that may be contributing to nonresponse. This study evaluated trends in angler demographics as they relate to annual steelhead report card return rates as well as online reporting rates across the 2012–2019 study period. The study also assessed whether specific demographic or behavioral characteristics may affect the likelihood of anglers returning their report cards. Older, more avid anglers were found to have a greater likelihood of reporting in general. Motivations or deterrents for response vs. nonresponse could not be identified due to data limitations and should be the subject of future research.
Publisher
California Fish and Wildlife Journal, California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Subject
Polymers and Plastics,General Environmental Science
Reference58 articles.
1. Bajjaliya, F. S. 2015. Steelhead Report and Restoration Card Program: 2006–2011. Administrative Report 2015-01, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Sacramento, CA, USA.
2. Barriball, K. L., and A. E. While. 1999. Non-response in survey research: a methodological discussion and development of an explanatory model. Journal of Advanced Nursing 30(3):677–686. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01117.x
3. Bartoń, K. 2022. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.47.1. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
4. Bray, G. S., and H. L. Schramm. 2001. Evaluation of a statewide volunteer angler diary program for use as a fishery assessment tool. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21(3):606–615. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(2001)021<0606:eoasva>2.0.co;2
5. Brown, T. L. 1991. Use and abuse of mail surveys in fisheries management. American Fisheries Society Symposium 12:255–261.