Abstract
Translocation of animals for conservation has a long history of successes and failures since humans began intervening with species distributions in the early part of the 20th century. Effects of translocations on other species occupying the area of introduction are rarely considered in species management plans. We hypothesized that the introduction of a large-bodied ungulate, Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus canadensis nelsoni), would cause a shift in the spatial distribution and winter habitat selection of a smaller-bodied ungulate, Rocky Mountain mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus hemionus), already occupying the study area in northeastern Nevada. We examined mule deer survey locations during an 8-year time interval from 1993 to 2001 to test hypotheses related to potential competition with or displacement of mule deer following introduction of elk in 1997. We used geospatial statistics to quantify changes in seasonal distributions of mule deer and a resource selection function (RSF) framework to model changes in selection of resources by mule deer before and after elk were translocated into our study area. Our results indicated that mule deer exhibited a shift in their core distribution by approximately 5.72 km after the introduction of elk. Mule deer changed their use of habitat by selecting shallower slopes, more north-facing aspects, and areas farther from the elk release site, where most of the elk congregated. Mule deer selected habitats with more pinyon-juniper tree cover and mixed shrublands prior to the elk translocation, indicating a potential tradeoff in thermal cover and forage quality. This research is one of the few empirical studies to describe competitive interactions between elk and mule deer on a shared winter range in North America. Implications of this research have importance for managers concerned with restoring communities to their native conditions especially where the potential for competition with non-indigenous species or other competing species with similar niche requirements exists.
Publisher
California Fish and Wildlife Journal, California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Reference61 articles.
1. Aho, K., D. Derryberry, and T. Peterson. 2017. A graphical framework for model selection criteria and significance tests: refutation, confirmation and ecology. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 8:47–56.
2. Arnold, T. W. 2010. Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike’s Information Criterion. Journal of Wildlife Management 74:1175–1178.
3. Belovsky, G. E. 1984. Herbivore optimal foraging: a comparative test of three models. The American Naturalist 124:97–115.
4. Bender, L. C., W. L. Myers, and W. R. Gould. 2003. Comparison of helicopter and ground surveys for North American elk Cervus elaphus and mule deer Odocoileus hemionus population composition. Wildlife Biology 9:199–205.
5. Berbach, M. W. 1993. Activity patterns and range relationships of tule elk and mule deer in Owens Valley. Dissertation, University of California, Berkley, CA, USA.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献