Affiliation:
1. Akdeniz Saglik Vakfi Yasam Hastanesi
2. SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İZMİR TEPECİK SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ, CERRAHİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ
3. SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İZMİR TEPECİK SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ, DAHİLİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ
4. SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İZMİR TEPECİK SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the Thyroid
Imaging, Reporting and Data System of the American
College of Radiology in thyroid nodules.
Material and Method
A total of 151 nodules were collected from 62 patients
undergoing thyroid surgery in our center between
August 2017 and September 2018. Ultrasonographic
features of each nodule were recorded and classified
according to the Thyroid, Imaging Reporting and Data
System of the American College of Radiology by two
radiologists and compared with a one-to-one basis on
histopathology.
Results
The median size of 151 thyroid nodules measured on
the ultrasound and in the pathology specimens were
19 (3-85) mm and 17 (0-97) mm, respectively. Papillary
carcinoma was demonstrated in 28 patients (45%),
papillary microcarcinoma in 14 patients (22.5%), and
Hurthle cell carcinoma in 1 (1.6%) patient. Overall
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value,
and negative predictive value for this nodule risk
stratification model were analyzed as 82.5%, 57%,
64.58%, and 77.67%, respectively.
Conclusion
Setting a definitive size threshold for fine needle
aspiration might be misleading, instead signifying the
malignant features on ultrasonography, and making a
decision for surgery on an individual base should be
recommended.
Publisher
Medical Journal of Suleyman Demirel University