Abstract
While the current developments in the peace processes allow us to imagine the
Korean Demilitarized Zone will acquire more thriving mobilities in the future, this
article seeks to characterize this unique space as an absolutely different place; a
“heterotopia” as suggested by Michel Foucault. In the course of the discussion,
which focuses on (non)human (im)mobilities within the framework of
the “new mobilities paradigm,” some main characteristics of the DMZ as a
heterotopia are identified. Firstly, as its descriptively most prominent characteristic, the DMZ is considered a borderland between two fiercely antagonistic
power politics, a borderland that comes to be realized as fluid and irremovable.
Secondly, considering criticisms of this notion of heterotopia to be negligent of
real power-knowledge relations, the article suggests that the DMZ as an inaccessible and immobile space controls the mobilities of all other spaces. Lastly, the
article proposes that the DMZ be developed into a heterotopic space that mirrors
and critically reflects the other prevailing spaces. These characteristics of the
heterotopic DMZ, i.e., a fluid and irremovable borderland, an inaccessible and
immobile space in power-knowledge relations, and a critically reflecting space, are
put under scrutiny with the metaphors of the river, the airport, and the mirror,
respectively
Funder
National Research Foundation of Korea
Publisher
The British Association for Korean Studies
Subject
General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities
Reference94 articles.
1. Adey, Peter. “If Mobility is Everything Then It is Nothing: Towards a Relational Politics of
2. (Im)Mobilities,” Mobilities 1.1 (2006): 75–94.
3. Adey, Peter. “‘May I Have Your Attention’: Airport Geographies of Spectatorship, Position, and (Im) Mobility,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25. 3 (2007): 515–536.
4. Aristotle, Physics, bk. 1, trans. Daniel W. Graham, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
5. Atanasova, Lyudmila. “The Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) as Liminal Space and Heterotopia,” Sociological Problems 51 (2019): 410–424.