Abstract
Background and Aims: In English conversations, where interlocutors may have differing language backgrounds or proficiency levels, effective communication relies on employing negotiation of meaning strategies to ensure mutual understanding and clarity. The purpose of this study was to examine the negotiation of meaning strategies used by EFL university students in conversation with a native speaker, highlighting their importance in achieving effective communication and linguistic development.
Methodology: Qualitative data were collected through recorded conversations in an academic setting, involving 20 EFL university students and a native speaker and were analyzed using conversation analysis.
Results: The study identified the top five negotiations of meaning strategies, with clarification requests and confirmation checks being most prevalent, indicating a strong preference for direct engagement in ensuring mutual understanding.
Conclusion: The findings emphasized the importance of incorporating targeted negotiation of meaning exercises into EFL curricula to improve students' communicative competence and cross-cultural understanding.
Publisher
Dr. Ken Institute of Academic Development and Promotion
Reference21 articles.
1. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bastos, M.T. (2011). Proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction, and the acquisition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(3), 347–384.
2. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
3. Chen, H.I., & Sevilla-Pavon, A. (2023). Negotiation of meaning via virtual exchange in immersive virtual reality environments. Language Learning & Technology, 27(2), 118-154.
4. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
5. Gass, S.M., & Varonis, E.M. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 376-387.