Author:
Rossi M. Adrian,Singer Eric A.,Golijanin Dragan J.,Monk Rebeca D.,Erturk Erdal,Bushinsky David A.
Abstract
Objectives: The gold standard for determining likelihood of calcium oxalate(CaOx) and calcium phosphate (CaPhos) stone formation in urine is supersaturationof CaOx and CaPhos. Our objective was to investigate whether traditionalmeasurement of total calcium, oxalate and phosphate in a 24-hour urinecollection is sufficiently sensitive and specific for detecting elevated supersaturationto preclude the more expensive supersaturation test.Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 150 consecutive patients withnephrolithiasis who underwent measurement of CaOx supersaturation (CaOxSS)and CaPhos supersaturation (CaPhosSS), as well as total calcium, oxalate andphosphate in a 24-hour urine collection. We used various cut-off values to determinesensitivity and specificity of 24-hour urine measurements for detectingelevated CaOxSS and CaPhosSS.Results: In men and women, the sensitivity of 24-hour calcium for detectingelevated CaOxSS was 71% and 79%, respectively; for oxalate, sensitivity was59% and 36%, respectively. In men and women, the sensitivity of 24-hour calciumfor detecting elevated CaPhosSS was 74% and 88%, respectively; for phosphate,sensitivity was 57% and 8%, respectively. In men and women, the specificityof 24-hour calcium for detecting elevated CaOxSS was 55% and 48%,respectively; it was 60% for detecting elevated CaPhosSS in both men andwomen.Conclusion: Traditional 24-hour urine analysis is sensitive, but not specific, fordetecting elevated CaOxSS and CaPhosSS. Most patients with abnormal 24-hour urine analysis have normal supersaturation, and treatment decisions basedon traditional urine analysis would lead to overtreatment in these patients.
Publisher
Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献