An analysis of benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical treatment reimbursement trends across Canada
-
Published:2024-04-02
Issue:8
Volume:18
Page:
-
ISSN:1920-1214
-
Container-title:Canadian Urological Association Journal
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:CUAJ
Author:
Chakraborty Anindyo,Elterman Dean S.,Corsi Nicholas,Bouhadana David,Bailly Gregory,Patel Premal,McLellan Rowen,Hickey Liam,Costa Daniel,Andrews Matthew,Evans Howard,Forbes Connor M.,Elmansy Hazem,Meskawi Malek,Bhojani Naeem,Chugtai Bilal,Zorn Kevin C.
Abstract
Introduction: A variety of procedures for the endoscopic surgical treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) refractory to medical therapy have existed for decades. The present study examines trends in surgeon compensation for these treatments within Canada.
Methods: The physician fee schedule for BPH surgery across 10 Canadian provinces for the years 2010 and 2023 were obtained. A descriptive study examining first, the provincial reimbursement for transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and laser ablative/enucleation surgery; second, the difference in TURP reimbursement between 2010 and 2023; and third, the annual change in TURP reimbursement juxtaposed with the annual change in the provincial Consumer Price Index (CPI) and annual salary for the working population aged 35–44.
Results: Seven of 10 Canadian provinces reimburse laser BPH surgery equally to TURP. The average provincial TURP reimbursement is $545, ranging from $451 in Ontario to $688 in Saskatchewan. Since 2010, TURP reimbursement has varied by province from a 0% net change in Ontario to an increase of 21% in Nova Scotia. Reimbursement for TURP has increased at a slower pace than the local CPI, and for half of the provinces at a slower pace than the annual salary for people aged 35–44.
Conclusions: The compensation model for endoscopic BPH surgery does not have a unified structure in Canada that is consistent across provinces, nor does it keep up with inflation, possibly impacting future recruitment, increasing geographic disparities, and most importantly, limiting the adoption of new BPH therapies.
Publisher
Canadian Urological Association Journal