Abstract
The detriment of rape even with the upsurge is received by the general mass with shock and the trauma enveloping the inflicted is incomprehensible. In a developing country like Bangladesh, the chastity of a woman is her ultimate pride and possession and when such is violated, considering the social predicament, the victim is usually humiliated in lieu of availing the much-required moral support to disposal. Falsely implicating an innocent is also evident in the trend. In the recent amendment, incarceration for life was substituted by the death penalty. Such incorporation endeavors toward the deterrent aspect of the penalty warning future perpetrators to avert from committing such mischief. This article aspires to illuminate the unexpanded idea of consent, extract the constitutional and legal justification of the recent amendment, the ends of statutory justice provided to the protected and sabotage of the very protective law, i.e., misapplication of it falsely incriminating an innocent.
Publisher
Universe Publishing Group - UniversePG
Reference106 articles.
1. Abdul Latif vs, (2011). 16 BLC 245.
2. Abdur Rahman & Ors vs State, (1999) 4 MLR (AD) 25.
3. Abdus Sobhan Biswas vs State, (2002) 54 DLR 556.
4. Abolishing Death Penalty (Asian Human Rights Charter), (1998). p.11. Available online at -
5. https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/452678304.pdf
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献