Rating methodology for energy company's sustainable development

Author:

KARYAKIN Aleksandr M.1ORCID,VELIKOROSSOV Vladimir V.2ORCID,FILIN Sergei A.2ORCID,TARASOVA Anna S.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ivanovo State Power University named after V.I. Lenin (ISPU)

2. Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (PRUE)

Abstract

Subject. The article addresses a rating methodology for sustainable development of energy companies. Objectives. We focus on developing a set of indicators and a scale of rating methodology for sustainable development of energy companies. Methods. The study employs methods of economic analysis, clustering, and economic statistics. Results. We developed a set of indicators and a scale of rating methodology for sustainable development of the energy company, including assessment of enterprise’s liquidity, financial stability, profitability, business, and market activity. The rating methodology takes into account the specific features of the electric power industry in terms of analysis and evaluation of specific energy indicators. Conclusions. The rating methodology enables objective comparative analysis of energy enterprises of Russia operating in the field of energy generation. The presented methodology is especially relevant due to the largest international rating agencies’ exit from the Russian market.

Publisher

Publishing House Finance and Credit

Subject

Automotive Engineering

Reference8 articles.

1. Al'shanskii L. [Do rating agencies have a future?]. Rynok tsennykh bumag = Securities Market, 2011, no. 9, pp. 44–46. (In Russ.)

2. Postyushkov A.V. [Methodology of rating assessment of enterprises]. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii = Property Relations in the Russian Federation, 2003, no. 1, pp. 46–54. URL: Link (In Russ.)

3. Aivazyan C.A., Golovan' S.V., Karminskii A.M., Peresetskii A.A. [About approaches to comparison of rating scales]. Prikladnaya ekonometrika = Applied Econometrics, 2011, no. 3, pp. 13–40. URL: Link (In Russ.)

4. Hainsworth R. [The comparability of credit rating level assigned by different rating agencies]. Den'gi i kredit = Russian Journal of Money and Finance, 2009, no. 12, pp. 46–50. (In Russ.)

5. Colman A.M., Norris C.E., Preston C.C. Comparing Rating Scales of Different Lengths: Equivalence of Scores from 5-Point and 7-Point Scales. Psychological Reports, 1997, vol. 80, iss. 2, pp. 355–362. URL: Link

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3