Safety and Efficacy of Medicinal Plants Used to Manufacture Herbal Products with Regulatory Approval in Uganda: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author:

Kaggwa Bruhan12ORCID,Kyeyune Henry2ORCID,Munanura Edson Ireeta2ORCID,Anywar Godwin3ORCID,Lutoti Stephen12ORCID,Aber Jacqueline1ORCID,Bagoloire Lynn K.4ORCID,Weisheit Anke1ORCID,Tolo Casim Umba1ORCID,Kamba Pakoyo Fadhiru2ORCID,Ogwang Patrick Engeu1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Pharm-Bio Technology and Traditional Medicine Center (PHARMBIOTRAC), P.O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda

2. Makerere University, College of Health Sciences, Department of Pharmacy, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda

3. Makerere University, Department of Plant Sciences, Microbiology and Biotechnology, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda

4. Makerere University, College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda

Abstract

Introduction. The Uganda National Drug Authority requires phytochemical screening, freedom from microbial contamination, and evidence of safety and efficacy of the constituent plants to register herbal products. Since Uganda has no pharmacopeia, safety, efficacy, and plant processing information are not readily available. We documented the plant materials used to manufacture products in Uganda and established evidence of their safety and efficacy and availability of monographs. Methods. The NDA register of herbal products was reviewed, and a product list was extracted. The herbal products were purchased from local pharmacies, and their labels were studied to identify plant ingredients and drug use. Literature was reviewed to document evidence of the safety and efficacy of the plant materials concerning manufacturer’s claims. Also, the WHO and available African Pharmacopeia were searched to establish the availability of the plant monographs. Results. Of the 84 NDA-registered local products, only 18 were obtained from the market; 82% were indicated for respiratory tract disorders. Thirty-three plant materials were listed with Eucalyptus globulus Labill, being the commonest. Several in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrate efficacy, thus supporting the use of the selected plant species for empirical treatment as stated on the product label. While most plants were safe, some species such as Albizia coriaria Oliv. had dose-dependent toxicities that cannot be predicted in combinations. The WHO, African Pharmacopoeia, and West African Herbal Pharmacopoeia had only 16 plant monographs of the 33 plants of interest. Nevertheless, Aloe vera (L.) Burm.f., Azadirachta indica A.Juss., Zingiber officinale Roscoe, and Allium sativum L. monographs were published by all three pharmacopoeias. Conclusions. Preclinical evidence of safety and efficacy exists in the literature for most of the plants used to manufacture registered herbal products in Uganda. More specific bioassays and clinical trials are required for the products to provide conclusive evidence of safety and toxicity. Monographs are urgently needed for the Ugandan plants.

Funder

World Bank

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Complementary and alternative medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3