The Disparity in the Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome between Obstetrician-Gynecologists in Different-Level Hospitals under the Hierarchical Medical System

Author:

Wang Yue1,Chen Jie1,Dong Han2,Ma Ruilin1,Zou Ying3,Wang Wei4,Zheng Qingmei5,Feng Ying6,Tan Zhangyun7,Zeng Xiaoqin8,Zhao Yinqing7,Deng Yan1,Wang Yanfang1,Gu Bei9,Sun Aijun110ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children’s Hospital of Jinzhou, Jinzhou, 121000 Liaoning, China

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, 410008 Hunan, China

4. Department of Reproductive Medicine, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050000 Hebei, China

5. Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266500 Shandong, China

6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006 Jiangxi, China

7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xinhui Maternity and Children’s Hospital, Nanning, 529100 Guangxi, China

8. Department of Gynecology, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou, 510000 Guangdong, China

9. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Peking University Ninth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing 100038, China

10. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100010, China

Abstract

Background. PCOS is a prevalent endocrine and metabolic disorder in women characterized by abnormal blood glucose, dyslipidemia, and abnormal mental health. To improve patient care, the goal of our study is to find out if there are differences in how PCOS patients are treated at different hospital levels within the hierarchical medical system. Methods. Obstetricians and gynecologists from primary, secondary, and tertiary hospitals were the participants in the survey. The responses provided and collected were analyzed using various statistical techniques like the chi-square test, Fisher exact test, and logistic regression with multiple variables. Results. The investigation examined 2298 survey replies (13.1% primary hospitals, 52.4% secondary hospitals, and 34.5% tertiary hospitals). As hospital grade increases, more participants inquire about a patient’s history of unfavorable pregnancies concerning hormone evaluation; the better the hospital’s grade, the greater the number of participants who would undergo AMH and androgen-related tests. The higher the hospital level, the more participants would pick the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to determine insulin resistance, the BMI Asian criteria for defining obesity, and blood lipids. Participants in primary (odds ratio OR = 0.383 , 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.282-0.520) and secondary ( OR = 0.607 , 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.481-0.765) hospitals were significantly less likely to select OGTT than those in tertiary hospitals. Comparatively, fewer primary hospitals chose to do lipid profiling than tertiary hospitals (OR 0.689, 95% CI 0.523-0.909). With the increase in hospital level, participants were more knowledgeable about the multiple efficacies and dose alternatives of metformin and selected letrozole and assisted reproduction more frequently. Conclusion. Our study uncovered differences in the endocrine evaluation, metabolic screening, and management of PCOS patients across obstetrics and gynecology at various hospital levels. Simultaneously, it underlines the need to improve the hierarchical medical system and close the knowledge gap across hospitals.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3