Developing Warrants for Designing Continuous Flow Intersection

Author:

Almoshaogeh Meshal1ORCID,Abou-Senna Hatem2ORCID,Radwan Essam2,Kamal Tarek Lotfy3,Alharbi Fawaz1,Alfawzan Mohammed4,Haider Husnain1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Qassim, Saudi Arabia

2. Department of Civil Environmental Construction Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, 4000 Central Florida Blvd, FL, USA

3. Center for Advanced Transportation Systems Simulation, Department of Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, 4000 Central Florida Blvd, FL, USA

4. Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Qassim University, Unayzah, Qassim 51911, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

The increase in the left-turn demand is the main cause of congestion at conventional intersections, and the traditional countermeasures are inadequate to solve this congestion due to the high changes in demand. This paper looks at the justifying threshold to redesign a signalized intersection from a conventional intersection (CI) to a continuous flow intersection (CFI) and create performance guidelines for decision-makers and professionals deciding to consider the alternative. A performance comparison between the CI and CFI was conducted to define the main parameters affecting the operational performance. To accomplish the paper’s objective, candidate locations that have already implemented the CFI were identified, and the location with sufficient data for analysis was selected. After the consideration of different evaluation tools, microsimulation (VISSIM 8) was utilized to model the before and after conditions of the location. Using the field data, signal optimization and driving behavior parameter sensitivity analysis were performed to calibrate the models to replicate real-life conditions. Afterwards, an experiment was designed to examine the different factors that affect the efficiency of each design. The experiment involved 72 different configurations of CFI and CI with 5 different volume levels and used two measures of effectiveness, average vehicle delay, and capacity to assess the results. The results were used to develop guidelines that will help the decision-makers to decide which design should be considered, which will result in developing a decision support system that will accelerate finding which design is superior to others.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference23 articles.

1. Performance Analysis of Parallel Flow Intersection and Displaced Left-Turn Intersection Designs

2. Comparison of three unconventional arterial intersection designs: continuous flow intersection, parallel flow intersection, and upstream signalized crossover;S. Cheong

3. Continuous flow intersections;R. Goldblatt,1994

4. Unconventional arterial intersection designs initiatives;M. Kim

5. Displaced left-turn intersection. Publication FHWA-HRT-09–055. FHWA;J. Bared;492 US Department of Transportation,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3